Mayweather Promotions CEO Leonard Ellerbe asserts that a potential bout between Canelo Alvarez and David Benavidez would generate more revenue than a match-up with Terence Crawford. Ellerbe emphasizes that while Crawford is regarded as the best fighter in the sport, the decision is based on business considerations rather than merit. He points to previous examples, such as the disparity in revenue between a fight involving Errol Spence and Terence Crawford versus a match featuring Tank and Ryan, to illustrate the influence of business dynamics on the success of pay-per-view events.By the Numbers
- Leonard Ellerbe claims that a fight between Canelo Alvarez and David Benavidez would be much bigger in terms of revenue than a potential match-up with Terence Crawford.
- He cites examples of previous fights to illustrate the impact of business considerations on the success of pay-per-view events.
- Leonard Ellerbe's statements provide insight into the business-driven decision-making processes in the boxing industry.
- His comments also shed light on the complexities of matchmaking and revenue generation in professional boxing.
Leonard Ellerbe's commentary underscores the significant influence of business considerations on the selection of potential opponents in professional boxing, highlighting the complex interplay between sporting merit and commercial viability.
The summary of the linked article was generated with the assistance of artificial intelligence technology from OpenAI