The recent House v. NCAA settlement poses a potential threat to the future of walk-on players in college football, limiting roster sizes and thus decreasing opportunities significantly. Walk-on athletes, like Camden Dempsey, a member of the Colorado Buffaloes, play critical roles in teams despite often going unrecognized. The settlement may result in cutting around 2,000 walk-on positions across FBS football, impacting both players' opportunities and team dynamics. Coaches are concerned about the new roster cap, which could lead to safety issues and fewer competitive programs overall, as highlighted by Kansas State’s Chris Klieman. The outcry from student-athletes for a seat at the table emphasizes the importance of their contributions and the unique role walk-ons play in the tradition of college athletics.

By the Numbers
  • Proposed roster cap of 105 players could eliminate approximately 2,000 walk-on positions across FBS.
  • Coaches predict that limiting the roster may lead to teams having as few as 75 available players by season's end.
Yes, But

The decision to impose roster limits has been heavily criticized by coaches and players who fear that it will compromise team safety and reduce the overall quality of college football. Additionally, concerns exist that the new structure disproportionately affects less-recognized athletes who are vital for team practice and development.

State of Play
  • Numerous athletes have filed objections against the settlement, advocating for the rights of current walk-ons to maintain their roster spots.
  • Concerns from coaches about the feasibility of fielding competitive teams under the new constraints are intensifying.
What's Next

As discussions surrounding the settlement continue, stakeholders will likely push for amendments that include protections for current walk-ons. A decision regarding the settlement is anticipated by April, which could lead to further legal challenges if modifications are not made.

Bottom Line

The potential reduction of walk-on players marks a significant shift in college football that risks undermining both the competitive landscape and the spirit of student-athlete inclusion. Those in power must acknowledge the invaluable role walk-ons play and ensure their voices are heard in legislation affecting their future.