NCAA’s decision to allow college athletes to monetize their name, image, and likeness (NIL) has stirred controversy. Now, the debate has shifted to extending the policy to high school athletes, with some states already permitting it. Proponents argue that high school athletes deserve to profit from their success, while opponents fear the impact on team dynamics and the potential exploitation of young athletes. It’s a complex issue, as high schoolers may lack the maturity and experience to handle the pressures and responsibilities that come with NIL deals. Balancing the need for fairness with preserving the cohesiveness of high school teams remains a key challenge.