In Los Angeles, hearings have wrapped up in a significant labor case involving USC football and basketball players, exploring their employment status.

By the Numbers
  • The case was first filed in February 2022 by Ramogi Huma and the National College Players Association.
  • The record for the case officially closes on July 31, with a decision likely to extend into 2025.
Yes, But

The NCAA and USC claim that student-athletes are not employees, despite former players highlighting employer-like control.

State of Play
  • Judge Eleanor Law will now take time to consider the arguments and evidence presented during the hearings.
  • The outcome is crucial as it could impact the economic and safety benefits for college athletes, potentially altering the landscape of collegiate sports.
What's Next

The lengthy waiting period begins until Judge Law delivers a ruling, and a decision could potentially extend into 2025 with the possibility of appeals.

Bottom Line

The conclusion of hearings in the USC athlete employment case sets the stage for a pivotal decision that could redefine the relationship between college athletes and their institutions, with significant implications for the future of collegiate sports.