The Pittsburgh Steelers recently extended Darnell Washington's contract for four years at $42 million, a decision that has drawn criticism from pundit Colin Cowherd. He questioned the logic of investing heavily in a blocking tight end, citing Washington's limited catching stats compared to top players like Travis Kelce. While Cowherd sees this as an overcommitment, others argue that with a growing salary cap, the financial impact may be more manageable.

By the Numbers
  • Darnell Washington's four-year contract totals $42 million, averaging over $10 million per year.
  • Washington's new deal ranks 12th among tight ends, behind teammate Pat Freiermuth, who is 9th.
Yes, But

Cowherd's main objection hinges on Washington's primary role as a blocker rather than a pass-catching tight end, yet some analysts believe his potential to develop into more of a receiving threat justifies the investment.

State of Play
  • The Steelers have few salary cap constraints as they are not currently paying a franchise quarterback.
  • Washington's performance has improved, with 31 receptions for 364 yards in his last season, marking career-best numbers.
What's Next

With a projected increased role in the Steelers' upcoming season, Washington aims to further develop his skills in a new offensive scheme under Mike McCarthy, potentially reshaping his value in the league.

Bottom Line

Though Cowherd views the contract as excessive for a blocking tight end, the Steelers may see it as a strategic move to retain a player with the potential to evolve into a significant offensive contributor.