The Pittsburgh Steelers received mixed reviews for their Day 2 draft picks, highlighted by a first-round success. They made two trades and selected four players. Notable picks include WR Germie Bernard, who garnered an A+ grade from CBS Sports, and QB Drew Allar, whose grade varied significantly due to concerns around inconsistency. Other selections included CB Daylen Everette and OG Gennings Dunker, both of whom faced a range of assessments reflecting their potential impact on the team.

By the Numbers
  • Germie Bernard was selected with pick 47 after a trade from pick 53.
  • Drew Allar was chosen at pick 76, marking the Steelers' second quarterback selection in recent years.
  • Daylen Everette and Gennings Dunker were selected at picks 85 and 96, respectively.
Yes, But

While the Steelers' early picks were generally well-received, there’s skepticism about developing two young quarterbacks concurrently. Critics argue that the selection of Allar may have been redundant given the existing prospects. This ongoing dialogue highlights the challenges of balancing immediate needs with long-term strategies.

State of Play
  • The Steelers have bolstered their receiving corps significantly with the addition of Bernard.
  • Allar's selection indicates a commitment to finding a future quarterback, despite varying opinions on his readiness.
  • Corners and offensive linemen have been prioritized to address team depth and future needs.
What's Next

As the offseason progresses, the Steelers will focus on developing their recently selected players. Fans can expect ongoing discussions about Allar's potential in comparison with Will Howard, hinting at a possible quarterback competition. Monitoring these players during training camps will provide insights into their effectiveness and readiness for the upcoming season.

Bottom Line

The Steelers’ Day 2 draft haul reflects a strategic combination of immediate needs and future potential, particularly with the signing of versatile players. However, the mixed reactions to Allar underscore the complexity of team building in a competitive league. The key takeaway is the balance between taking risks on high-upside players while maintaining current team depth.